Exertion of GAP Influence in the Pending APA Ethics Revision Process
John Fennig, PhD
Beginner, Intermediate, Advanced
This view declares that any consultation that does not meet these criteria is unethical. These requirements, if adopted into the ethics code, would substantially constrain the practice of GAP. Colloquium Purpose: Potential revisions to the APA Ethical Principles and Code of Conduct could substantially constrain the practice of GAP. This colloquium is an opportunity for parties from within GAP, concerned about the ethics code revision outcomes, to meet to collectively consider the direction and tenor of this pending revision process. We will consider whether and how to plan action to ensure respect for the diverse values and GAP practice principles that currently exist within APA.